PENGEMBANGAN MODEL PEMBELAJARAN PENDIDIKAN AGAMA ISLAM BERBASIS DEEP LEARNING MELALUI PENDEKATAN MULTIDISIPLINER
Keywords:
Islamic religious education, deep learning, multidisciplinary approach, value reflection, learning model developmentAbstract
This study aims to develop a deep learning-based Islamic Religious Education (IRE) learning model through a multidisciplinary approach in order to improve students' conceptual understanding, value reflection, and critical thinking skills. The deep learning approach in the context of education emphasises meaningful and reflective learning processes, rather than mere memorisation, so that religious education becomes more contextual and relevant to the dynamics of the 21st century. The research method used was qualitative with a research and development (R&D) design, involving four stages: needs analysis, conceptual model design, cross-disciplinary expert validation (religious education, educational psychology, and learning technology), and limited implementation testing in three secondary schools in West Java. Data was collected through in-depth interviews, participatory observation, and document analysis, then analysed using reflective thematic analysis. The results showed that the deep learning-based PAI learning model significantly improved students' conceptual understanding, spiritual reflection skills, and cross-disciplinary collaboration. Multidisciplinary integration (religion–science–technology) helped students relate Islamic values to current issues such as digital ethics and the environment. The use of technology and AI-based feedback also strengthened personalised learning and student engagement. This study reinforces the theories of constructive alignment, experiential learning, and technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) in the context of modern Islamic education. Practically, this study recommends strengthening the digital competence of Islamic education teachers, increasing cross-disciplinary collaboration, and educational policies that encourage the integration of deep learning and technology ethics in the Islamic education curriculum. The resulting model is expected to be a reflective, adaptive, and contextual learning framework in shaping a religious, critical, and characterful generation in the digital era.
Downloads
References
Mudin, I. (2025). Critical analysis of the application of deep learning in Islamic religious education. Intiqād: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Islam dan Sosial, xx(x), xx–xx.
Nasution, B., Prasetyo, A. H., Jibril, A. O., & Saputra, D. (2024). Deep learning opportunities in progressive Islamic education. Syāmil: Journal of Islamic Education, 12(1), 173–187. https://doi.org/10.21093/sy.v12i2.10002
Supriyadi, T., Julia, J., Supriadi, U., Rahminawati, N., & Baxtiyorovna, A. (2025). DEEP-AI pedagogical model for strengthening Al-Qur’an interpretation literacy in Islamic Religious Education. Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam, 22(1), 275–294. https://doi.org/10.14421/jpai.v22i1.11053
Zainab, N. (2025). Deep learning model in personalizing learning based on the “Love Curriculum” in Islamic boarding school. Proceedings International Conference on Education, 383–399.
Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (Eds.). (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. Longman.
Beane, J. A. (1997). Curriculum integration: Designing the core of democratic education. Teachers College Press.
Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2011). Teaching for quality learning at university (4th ed.). McGraw-Hill.
Entwistle, N., & Ramsden, P. (2015). Understanding student learning. Routledge.
Gearon, L. (2013). MasterClass in religious education. Bloomsbury.
Halstead, J. M. (2004). An Islamic concept of education. Comparative Education, 40(4), 517–529.
Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Routledge.
Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2019). Artificial intelligence in education: Promises and implications for teaching and learning. Center for Curriculum Redesign.
Jackson, R. (2004). Rethinking religious education and plurality. RoutledgeFalmer.
Kolb, D. A. (2015). Experiential learning (2nd ed.). Pearson.
Laurillard, D. (2012). Teaching as a design science. Routledge.
Luckin, R., et al. (2016). Intelligence unleashed: An argument for AI in education. Pearson.
Mayer, R. E. (2009). Multimedia learning (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Merrill, M. D. (2002). First principles of instruction. Educational Technology Research and Development, 50(3), 43–59.
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054.
Roediger, H. L., III, & Karpicke, J. D. (2006). Test-enhanced learning. Psychological Science, 17(3), 249–255.
Sweller, J. (2011). Cognitive load theory. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 55, 37–76.
Wiggins, G., & McTighe, J. (2005). Understanding by design (2nd ed.). ASCD.
Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on AI applications in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1), 39.
Borg, W. R., & Gall, M. D. (2003). Educational research: An introduction (7th ed.). Longman.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2019). Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 11(4), 589–597.
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. SAGE Publications.
Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2016). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (4th ed.). Jossey-Bass.
Beane, J. A. (1997). Curriculum integration: Designing the core of democratic education. Teachers College Press.
Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2011). Teaching for quality learning at university (4th ed.). McGraw-Hill.
Halstead, J. M. (2004). An Islamic concept of education. Comparative Education, 40(4), 517–529.
Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2019). Artificial intelligence in education: Promises and implications for teaching and learning. Center for Curriculum Redesign.
Kolb, D. A. (2015). Experiential learning (2nd ed.). Pearson.
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054.
Wiggins, G., & McTighe, J. (2005). Understanding by design (2nd ed.). ASCD.
Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on AI applications in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1), 39.
Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2011). Teaching for quality learning at university (4th ed.). McGraw-Hill.
Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2019). Artificial intelligence in education: Promises and implications for teaching and learning. Center for Curriculum Redesign.
Kolb, D. A. (2015). Experiential learning (2nd ed.). Pearson.
Luckin, R., Holmes, W., Griffiths, M., & Forcier, L. B. (2016). Intelligence unleashed: An argument for AI in education. Pearson.
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054.
Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on AI applications in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1), 39.
