STRENGTHENING RELIGIOUS MODERATION THROUGH THE ICEBERG ANALYSIS MODEL AS AN EFFORT TO COUNTERACT COGNITIVE BIAS AMONG RADICAL GROUPS FOR ISLAMIC EDUCATION STUDENTS UIN FATMAWATI SUKARNO BENGKULU
Keywords:
Strengthening Religious Moderation, Iceberg Analysis Model, Cognitive Bias of RadicalistsAbstract
The aim of this research is to find out the process of strengthening religious moderation through developing the iceberg analysis model as an effort to counteract the cognitive bias of radicals in Islamic religious education students at UIN Famawati Sukarno Bengkulu and to find out the effectiveness of developing the iceberg analysis model as an effort to counteract the cognitive bias of radicals in students Islamic religious education at UIN Famawati Sukarno Bengkulu. The research method that will be used is Participatory Action Research (PAR). Through this method, researchers will involve themselves directly in strengthening religious moderation through the Iceberg analysis model as an effort to counteract the cognitive bias of radicals in Islamic Religious Education students at UIN Fatmawati Sukarno Bengkulu. The results of the research are that Islamic Religious Education Students identified events related to moderate/immoderate actions. Islamic Religious Education Students identify events related to the cognitive bias of radicals, Islamic Religious Education Students formulate patterns and trends, cause structures and determine mental models. Islamic Religious Education Students formulate theoretical actions. Carrying out change action movements through; rethinking, redesigning, reframing to actually reacting.
Downloads
References
Abror Mhd. (2020). Moderasi Beragama dalam Bingkai Toleransi ( Kajian Islam dan Keberagaman ). Rusydiah, 1(1), 137–148.
Ali, N. (2020). Measuring religious moderation among Muslim students at public colleges in Kalimantan facing disruption era. INFERENSI: Jurnal Penelitian Sosial Keagamaan, 14(1), 1–24.
Arifinsyah, A., Andy, S., & Damanik, A. (2020). The urgency of religious moderation in preventing radicalism in Indonesia. ESENSIA: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Ushuluddin, 21(1), 91–108.
Chan, D. (2020). How to make critical decisions amid Covid-19 pressures. The Straits Times, A28.
Creswell, J. W. (2013). Research Design Pendekatan Penelitian Kualitatiif, Kuantitatif, dan Mixed, 1–308. Retrieved from file:///C:/Users/Hp/Documents/buku creswell.pdf
Dacey, A. (2020). Come now, let us reason together: Cognitive bias, individualism, and interactionism in critical thinking education. Informal Logic, 40(1), 47–76.
Dodego, S. H. A., & Witro, D. (2020). The Islamic moderation and the prevention of radicalism and religious extremism in Indonesia. Dialoq, 43(2), 199–208.
Fuadi, M. A. (2021). Ketahanan Moderasi Beragama Mahasiswa di Tengah Melting Pot Gerakan Keagamaan di Surakarta. Al-Adabiya: Jurnal Kebudayaan dan Keagamaan, 16(2), 125–140.
Hadziq, A. (2019). Nasionalisme Organisasi Mahasiswa Islam dalam Menangkal Radikalisme di Institut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Surakarta. Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam Al-Thariqah, 4(1), 50–59.
Hanani, S., & Nelmaya, N. (2020). Penguatan Moderasi Beragama untuk Mengatasi Intolerasi di Kalangan Intelektual Kampus. Kontekstualita, 35(02), 91–102.
Hernawan, W., Riyani, I., Busro, B., State, I. & Bandung, D. (2021). Religious moderation in Naskah Wawacan Babad Walangsungsang: A Sundanese religious diversity wisdom. HTS Teologiese Studies/Theological Studies, 77(4), 1–13.
IAIN Surakarta, F. (n.d.). MEMBENDUNG ARUS PAHAM KEAGAMAAN RADIKAL DI KALANGAN MAHASISWA PTKIN Toto Suharto dan Ja’far Assagaf. Retrieved from http://diktis.kemenag.go.id/index.php?berita=detil&jd=162
Ibrahim, I., Prasojo, Z. H., & Sulaiman, S. (2019). Preventing radicalism: Islamic moderation and revitalization in the border. Wawasan: Jurnal Ilmiah Agama Dan Sosial Budaya., 4(1), 1–15.
Jawab, P., Syafii, A., Jeffrie, M., Rizal, G., Pemimpin, S., Fajar, U., Ul, R., et al. (2013). Menghalau Radikalisasi Kaum Muda : Gagasan dan Aksi. Maarif, 1(Arus Pemikiran Islam dan Sosial), 14.
Jay, N., Kohler, F., & Napoli, A. (2008). Analysis of social communities with iceberg and stability-based concept lattices. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 4933 LNAI, 258–272.
Junaedi, E. (2019). Inilah moderasi beragama perspektif Kemenag. Harmoni, 18(2), 182–186.
Kenyon, T., & Beaulac, G. (2014). Critical thinking education and debiasing. Informal Logic, 34(4), 341–363.
Latif, Y. (2011). Negara Paripurna: Historisitas, Rasionalitas, dan Aktualitas Pancasila. Jakarta: PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Lechanoine, F., & Gangi, K. (2020). COVID-19: Pandemic of Cognitive Biases Impacting Human Behaviors and Decision-Making of Public Health Policies. Frontiers: Public Health, 8(613290).
MacLean, C. L. (2022). Cognitive bias in workplace investigation: Problems, perspectives and proposed solutions. Applied Ergonomics, 105, 103860.
Mayasari, R. (2016). Peran Pemikiran Heuristik pada Hubungan Persepsi Sosial dengan Munculnya Sikap terhadap Ide Penegakkan Khilafah Islamiyah di Indonesia. Al-Ulum, 16(2), 387–411.
Maynes, J. 2015. (2015). Critical thinking and cognitive bias, Informal Logic 35(2): 183-203. Informal Logic, 35(2), 183–203.
Mu’ti, A. & Islam, I. (2009). Inkulturasi Islam: Menyemai Persaudaraan, Keadilan, dan Emansipasi Kemanusiaan, Keadilan, Dan Emansipasi Kemanusiaan,. Jakarta: Al-Washat Publishing House.
Muhajir, A. (2018). Membangun Nalar Islam Moderat Kajian Metodologis. Situbondo: Tanwirul Afkar.
Nilsson, M. (2021). Jihadiship: from radical behavior to radical beliefs. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 44(3), 181–197.
Nurlaila. (2018). Radikalisme di Kalangan Terdidik. IQ (Ilmu Al-qur’an): Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 1(02), 266–285.
Pandey, F. (2021). Pengertian dan Jenis-Jenis Bias Kognitif Sering Terjadi Pada Otak Manusia. https://fhandypandey.com/ pengertian-dan-jenis-jenis-bias-kognitifsering- terjadi-pada-otak-manusia-1519/.
Permana, B. . (2021). Efek Bias Kognitif dalam Pengambilan Keputusan dan Cara Mencegahnya.
Sarereake, E. A., Triwantoro, H. F., Yaslim, N. P., Pernandes, D., & Diana, B. (2021). Survey Tentang Fenomena Gunung Es Psikoanalisa, (October), 2.
Selvia, S., Rahmat, M., & Anwar, S. (2022). Tingkat Pemahaman Mahasiswa Pendidikan Agama Islam di Perguruan Tinggi Umum dan Perguruan Tinggi Keagamaan Islam Negeri terhadap Konsep Moderasi Beragama. Intizar, 28, 1–9. Retrieved from http://repository.upi.edu/id/eprint/72921
Senata, A. P., Asrohah, H., Najiyah, S. F., & Arif, S. (2021). Epistemic Rationality In Islamic Education: The Significance for Religious Moderation in Contemporary Indonesian Islam. Ulul Albab, 22(2), 232.
Subchi, I., Zulkifli, Z., Latifa, R., & Sa’diyah, S. (2022). Religious Moderation in Indonesian Muslims. Religions, 13(5), 451.
Susanto, H. (2021). Kebenaran Yang Absolut, 15–34.
Syihab. A., K. (2019, May). Bias Kognitif Kaum Radikalis.
Tarwati, K., Danismaya, I., & S. (2022). ANALISIS BIAS KOGNITIF MASYARAKAT TERHADAP INFORMASI HOAKS TENTANG COVID-19. Jurnal Keperawatan’Aisyiyah, 9(1), 73–81.
Usman, S., Qodir, Z., & Hasse, J. (2014). Radikalisme Agama di Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 1–240. Retrieved from http://repository.umy.ac.id/bitstream/handle/123456789/28248/Bab I Pendahuluan.pdf?sequence=1
