STEM-BASED LEARNING FOR 21ST-CENTURY COMPETENCIES IN INDONESIA: INTEGRATING TECHNOLOGY, PEDAGOGY, AND EDUCATIONAL INNOVATION

Authors

  • Neneng Hayati Universitas Ekuitas Indonesia Author
  • Erwin Yulianto Universitas Langlangbuana Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23103082

Keywords:

STEM-based learning, 21st-century competencies, technology integration, pedagogical innovation, higher-order thinking skills, Indonesia

Abstract

This study examines the role of STEM-based learning in developing 21st-century competencies in Indonesia through the integration of technology, pedagogy, and educational innovation. An integrative literature review approach was employed to identify, analyze, and synthesize relevant peer-reviewed literature, primarily indexed in Scopus. The analysis focused on technology integration, STEM pedagogical innovation, authentic and collaborative learning, higher-order thinking skills, and 21st-century competencies. The findings reveal that STEM education in Indonesia has increasingly shifted from content-oriented instruction toward interdisciplinary, student-centered, contextual, and problem-oriented learning. Project-based learning, problem-based learning, inquiry-based learning, and engineering design emerge as prominent pedagogical approaches supporting STEM implementation. These approaches contribute to the development of critical thinking, creativity, problem-solving, communication, collaboration, scientific literacy, and digital literacy. However, STEM implementation remains constrained by disparities in technological infrastructure, teacher readiness, interdisciplinary integration, and unequal implementation across educational contexts and regions. This study proposes an integrated conceptual framework consisting of Technology Integration → STEM Pedagogical Innovation → Authentic and Collaborative Learning → Higher-Order Thinking Skills → 21st-Century Competencies. The framework emphasizes that technology alone does not generate future-ready competencies; rather, its educational value depends on pedagogical transformation and meaningful learning experiences. The study provides conceptual implications for strengthening STEM education and directions for future empirical research in Indonesia.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ardwiyanti, D., Prasetyo, Z. K., & Wilujeng, I. (2021). STEM research trends in Indonesia: A systematic review. Journal of Science Education Research, 5(1), 38–45.

Farwati, R., Metafisika, K., Sari, I., Sitinjak, D. S., Solikha, D. F., & Solfarina. (2021). STEM education implementation in Indonesia: A scoping review. International Journal of STEM Education for Sustainability, 1(1), 11–32. https://doi.org/10.53889/ijses.v1i1.2

Ilma, S., Al-Muhdhar, M. H. I., Rohman, F., & Saptasari, M. (2023). Promoting students' metacognitive awareness and cognitive learning outcomes in science education. Pegem Journal of Education and Instruction, 13(2), 231–242.

Kelley, T. R., & Knowles, J. G. (2016). A conceptual framework for integrated STEM education. International Journal of STEM Education, 3, Article 11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-016-0046-z

Lafifa, F., Parno, P., Hamimi, E., & Setiawan, A. M. (2023). Development of STEM animation learning media with feedback to facilitate students’ critical thinking ability on global warming materials. Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn), 17(4), 553–563.

Li, Y. (2025). Advancing STEM education research and practice: Global developments and future directions. International Journal of STEM Education, 12.

Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x

Muchtar, Z., & Ding, L. (2024). Indonesian science teachers’ perceptions of integrated STEM education and its implementation. Pegem Journal of Education and Instruction, 14(1), 187–198.

Nugraha, M. G., Kidman, G., & Tan, H. (2023). Pre-service science teachers’ perceptions and understanding of integrated STEM education in Indonesia. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Indonesia (Indonesian Journal of Science Education), 11(4), 810–826.

Nugroho, O. F., Permanasari, A., & Firman, H. (2019). The movement of STEM education in Indonesia: Science teachers’ perspectives. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 8(3), 417–425.

OECD. (2023). PISA 2022 results (Volume I): The state of learning and equity in education. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/53f23881-en

OECD. (2024). PISA 2022 results (Volume III): Creative minds, creative schools. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/765ee8c2-en

Sihombing, A. A., Anugrahsari, S., Parlina, N., & Kusumastuti, Y. S. (2024). STEM-based education for sustainable development in Indonesia: A systematic literature review. International Journal of STEM Education.

Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039

Torraco, R. J. (2016). Writing integrative literature reviews: Using the past and present to explore the future. Human Resource Development Review, 15(4), 404–428. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484316671606

van Laar, E., van Deursen, A. J. A. M., van Dijk, J. A. G. M., & de Haan, J. (2017). The relation between 21st-century skills and digital skills: A systematic literature review. Computers in Human Behavior, 72, 577–588. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.03.010

Downloads

Published

2026-10-02